The association between prehospital care and in-hospital treatment decisions in acute stroke: a cohort study
dc.contributor.author | Sheppard, James P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mellor, Ruth M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Greenfield, Sheila | |
dc.contributor.author | Mant, Jonathan | |
dc.contributor.author | Quinn, Tom | |
dc.contributor.author | Sandler, David | |
dc.contributor.author | Sims, Don | |
dc.contributor.author | Singh, Satinder | |
dc.contributor.author | Ward, Matthew | |
dc.contributor.author | McManus, Richard J. | |
dc.contributor.author | CLAHRC BBC investigators | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-07-03T09:16:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-07-03T09:16:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Sheppard, James P. et al, 2015. The association between prehospital care and in-hospital treatment decisions in acute stroke: a cohort study. Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 32 (2), 93-9. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-0213 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-0205 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/emermed-2013-203026 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/66 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background Hospital prealerting in acute stroke improves the timeliness of subsequent treatment, but little is known about the impact of prehospital assessments on in-hospital care. Objective Examine the association between prehospital assessments and notification by emergency medical service staff on the subsequent acute stroke care pathway. Methods This was a cohort study of linked patient medical records. Consenting patients with a diagnosis of stroke were recruited from two urban hospitals. Data from patient medical records were extracted and entered into a Cox regression analysis to investigate the association between time to CT request and recording of onset time, stroke recognition (using the Face Arm Speech Test (FAST)) and sending of a prealert message. Results 151 patients (aged 71±15 years) travelled to hospital via ambulance and were eligible for this analysis. Time of symptom onset was recorded in 61 (40%) cases, the FAST test was positive in 114 (75%) and a prealert message was sent in 65 (44%). Following adjustment for confounding, patients who had time of onset recorded (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03), were FAST-positive (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80) or were prealerted (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38), were more likely to receive a timely CT request in hospital. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of hospital prealerting, accurate stroke recognition, and recording of onset time. Those not recognised with stroke in a prehospital setting appear to be excluded from the possibility of rapid treatment in hospital, even before they have been seen by a specialist. https://emj.bmj.com/content/32/2/93.long This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203026 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Emergency Medical Services | en_US |
dc.subject | Stroke | en_US |
dc.subject | Neurologic Examination | en_US |
dc.subject | Time Factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Radiography | en_US |
dc.title | The association between prehospital care and in-hospital treatment decisions in acute stroke: a cohort study | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article/Review | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Emergency Medicine Journal | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-06-27 | |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1136/emermed-2013-203026 | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-06-27 | |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en_US |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2013-10 | |
html.description.abstract | Background Hospital prealerting in acute stroke improves the timeliness of subsequent treatment, but little is known about the impact of prehospital assessments on in-hospital care. Objective Examine the association between prehospital assessments and notification by emergency medical service staff on the subsequent acute stroke care pathway. Methods This was a cohort study of linked patient medical records. Consenting patients with a diagnosis of stroke were recruited from two urban hospitals. Data from patient medical records were extracted and entered into a Cox regression analysis to investigate the association between time to CT request and recording of onset time, stroke recognition (using the Face Arm Speech Test (FAST)) and sending of a prealert message. Results 151 patients (aged 71±15 years) travelled to hospital via ambulance and were eligible for this analysis. Time of symptom onset was recorded in 61 (40%) cases, the FAST test was positive in 114 (75%) and a prealert message was sent in 65 (44%). Following adjustment for confounding, patients who had time of onset recorded (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.03), were FAST-positive (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.80) or were prealerted (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.38), were more likely to receive a timely CT request in hospital. Conclusions This study highlights the importance of hospital prealerting, accurate stroke recognition, and recording of onset time. Those not recognised with stroke in a prehospital setting appear to be excluded from the possibility of rapid treatment in hospital, even before they have been seen by a specialist. https://emj.bmj.com/content/32/2/93.long This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2013-203026 | en_US |