Prehospital amputation: a scoping review
dc.contributor.author | Gander, Bradley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-12T14:16:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-12T14:16:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-01 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Bradley, G., 2020. Prehospital amputation: a scoping review. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 12 (1), 6-13. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-1376 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-9457 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12968/jpar.2020.12.1.6 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/785 | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract published with permission. Background: Where limbs or extremities become entrapped and it is not possible to extricate a patient in time to prevent death, or because of a deterioration or scene safety emergency, prehospital amputation is an option to enable extrication. Aims: This study aimed to analyse accounts of prehospital amputation and identify factors that may influence practice as well as areas for further research. Methods: A search of multiple databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMCARE, Google Scholar and PubMed) and additional literature for accounts of prehospital amputation was carried out. Results: Thirteen sources of evidence describing 20 cases of prehospital amputation (18) or dismemberment (2) in a variety of settings between 1975 and 2019 were identified. Prehospital amputation was reported following structural collapse (8), industrial accidents (6), road traffic crashes (5) and rail incidents (1). The procedure was undertaken for a range of reasons, including unsuccessful traditional extrication attempts (7), time-critical patient condition (6), a risk of further extrication attempts causing structural destabilisation (5) and dismemberment of deceased victims (2). The equipment used to perform the amputation was not reported in 14 cases. Outcomes were reported in 17 accounts, with all patients surviving to hospital. Conclusion: Prehospital amputation is performed extremely rarely and accounts in the literature are limited. The situations and environments in which prehospital amputation is reported vary and specialist teams are often required. Further review of guidance and studies on techniques may be beneficial. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Pre-hospital Amputation | en_US |
dc.subject | Entrapment | en_US |
dc.subject | Extrication | en_US |
dc.subject | Confined Spaces | en_US |
dc.subject | Pre-hospital Care | en_US |
dc.subject | Emergency Medical Services | en_US |
dc.title | Prehospital amputation: a scoping review | en_US |
dc.type | Journal Article/Review | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of Paramedic Practice | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-01-30 | |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | All Rights Reserved | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-01-30 | |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en_US |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2020-01-14 | |
html.description.abstract | Abstract published with permission. Background: Where limbs or extremities become entrapped and it is not possible to extricate a patient in time to prevent death, or because of a deterioration or scene safety emergency, prehospital amputation is an option to enable extrication. Aims: This study aimed to analyse accounts of prehospital amputation and identify factors that may influence practice as well as areas for further research. Methods: A search of multiple databases (AMED, BNI, CINAHL, EMCARE, Google Scholar and PubMed) and additional literature for accounts of prehospital amputation was carried out. Results: Thirteen sources of evidence describing 20 cases of prehospital amputation (18) or dismemberment (2) in a variety of settings between 1975 and 2019 were identified. Prehospital amputation was reported following structural collapse (8), industrial accidents (6), road traffic crashes (5) and rail incidents (1). The procedure was undertaken for a range of reasons, including unsuccessful traditional extrication attempts (7), time-critical patient condition (6), a risk of further extrication attempts causing structural destabilisation (5) and dismemberment of deceased victims (2). The equipment used to perform the amputation was not reported in 14 cases. Outcomes were reported in 17 accounts, with all patients surviving to hospital. Conclusion: Prehospital amputation is performed extremely rarely and accounts in the literature are limited. The situations and environments in which prehospital amputation is reported vary and specialist teams are often required. Further review of guidance and studies on techniques may be beneficial. | en_US |