• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • West Midlands Ambulance Service [WMAS]
    • Publications - West Midlands Ambulance Service
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • West Midlands Ambulance Service [WMAS]
    • Publications - West Midlands Ambulance Service
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of amberCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournal TitleProfilesView

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About amber

    About amberGeneral Policies Terms of DepositSuggest an addition to amberamber Advisory NoteBrief Guide to searching amber

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    ‘They are not silly people – they know the difference’: clinician focus group views on a pilot randomised controlled trial of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Average rating
     
       votes
    Cast your vote
    You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item. When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
    Star rating
     
    Your vote was cast
    Thank you for your feedback
    Author
    Miller, Joshua cc
    Keating, Samuel
    Scott, Alex
    Fuller, Gordon W.
    Goodacre, Steve
    Keyword
    Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
    Pre-hospital Care
    Respiratory Failure
    Emergency Medical Services
    Journal title
    Emergency Medicine Journal
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/764
    DOI
    10.1136/emermed-2019-999abs.28
    Abstract
    Background Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is not in widespread use in UK ambulance services, but could benefit patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). As a new treatment in this context, clinician acceptability is an important factor in the feasibility of conducting definitive research in the prehospital arena. Methods As part of a pilot randomised controlled trial (the ACUTE study), nine trial-trained paramedics took part in three semi-structured focus groups. 204 trained staff had been given the opportunity to take part. The sample included six staff who had recruited to the trial, one who had not, and two who had withdrawn from it. Audio-recordings were transcribed and analysed thematically. Results Participants described facilitators to trial participation including: clear eligibility criteria and patient documentation, access to demonstration equipment, training away from the work environment, and repeated patient recruitment. Barriers to taking part included: the lack of protected time for training, inadequate workplace facilities for the electronic learning package used, adverse responses by receiving hospital staff, and infrequent patient exposure. Both paramedics who withdrew cited the inconvenience of carrying packs each shift. Some participants described anxiety and distress when opening packs to find a standard-care mask, and reported patients having similar reactions. Conclusions Future researchers could promote improved workplace computing facilities and increased provision of face-to-face training days, which were praised by participants in these focus groups, but limited to a single event distant from some staff. Greater stakeholder engagement by researchers could reduce the difficulties at hospital handover reported by some ambulance staff. Where blinding is not possible, the perceptions of clinicians and patients should be considered carefully, as this study shows both may have adverse emotional responses to being treated with standard care, particularly when prospective consent discussions describe the trial intervention as potentially beneficial., https://emj.bmj.com/content/36/10/e12.2 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-999abs.28
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1136/emermed-2019-999abs.28
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Publications - West Midlands Ambulance Service

    entitlement

     

    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.