Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGoulding, James
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07T14:22:16Z
dc.date.available2020-01-07T14:22:16Z
dc.date.issued2014-08
dc.identifier.citationGoulding, J., 2014. Paramedic Pathfinder: is it really better than current practice? Journal of Paramedic Practice, 6 (8), 396-397.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1759-1376
dc.identifier.issn2041-9457
dc.identifier.doi10.12968/jpar.2014.6.8.396
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/497
dc.description.abstractAbstract published with permission. Following the recent publication of an article on the Paramedic Pathfinder in the Emergency Medicine Journal, James Goulding argues that rather than highlighting a step forward for the paramedic profession, it serves as an indication that there needs to be more rigorous research before a change in current methods can be recommended.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Servicesen_US
dc.subjectParamedic Practiceen_US
dc.subjectReferral and Consultationen_US
dc.subjectParamedicsen_US
dc.subjectPre-hospital Careen_US
dc.titleParamedic Pathfinder: is it really better than current practice?en_US
dc.typeJournal Article/Review
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Paramedic Practiceen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-19
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-19
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2014-08
html.description.abstractAbstract published with permission. Following the recent publication of an article on the Paramedic Pathfinder in the Emergency Medicine Journal, James Goulding argues that rather than highlighting a step forward for the paramedic profession, it serves as an indication that there needs to be more rigorous research before a change in current methods can be recommended.en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record