What makes clinicians decide to use spinal immobilisation? A review of the literature
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Keyword
Emergency Medical ServicesSpinal Injuries
Spinal Cord Injuries
Immobilization
Cervical Vertebrae
Journal title
Journal of Paramedic Practice
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Abstract published with permission. Current practice of spinal immobilisation appears to be based heavily on historical practice rather than scientific precedence. Evidence shows that it is common practice to immobilise patients, yet studies demonstrating the benefit of this is limited. The decision made by the clinician to immobilise a patient is based on fear of reprisal, caution and ritualised practice rather than robust clinical assessment or a definitive criteria. A global, standardised criteria and robust immobilisation method is yet to be established. This article will examine and critically analyse existing literature surrounding patient immobilisation following a suspected or confirmed acute neck injury. In particular, literature on the use of a cervical collar and head blocks and the use of clinician decision tools will be critically analysed.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.12968/jpar.2014.6.4.174
Scopus Count
Collections