Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrice, J.
dc.contributor.authorMurphy-Jones, Barry
dc.contributor.authorEdwards, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16T10:04:10Z
dc.date.available2019-10-16T10:04:10Z
dc.date.issued2018-04
dc.identifier.citationPrice, J. and Murphy-Jones, B. and Edwards, T., 2018. The pre-hospital management of acute heart failure: a clinical audit of current practice. BMJ Open, 8 (Suppl. 1), A32.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.85
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/366
dc.description.abstractAim There has been a drive towards an increase in community-based management of heart failure. When patients experience acute heart failure (AHF), the complex nature of this condition poses diagnostic uncertainty for first responders. It is widely accepted that all patients should be transferred promptly to hospital, however with the introduction of pre-hospital diuresis, nitrate therapy and more recently non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the debate into the appropriateness and limitations of so-called ‘stay-and-play’ management strategies for patients in AHF has been re-ignited. We examine the current clinical assessment and management of AHF within the London Ambulance Service. Method Ambulance Patient Report Forms (PRFs) from cases that were coded with heart failure, shortness of breath, cardiac problem and in cases of GTN administration. These cases were further analysed by a clinical review panel to identify patients with suspected AHF. Results 182 patients were included in the analysis between April and November 2016. There was a 68% compliance with national guidelines for clinical assessment (history, examination and ECG). 51 (28%) patients presenting with AHF were appropriately identified and given a primary diagnosis of AHF by the attending clinician. 136 (76%) patients in the analysis received sublingual nitrate therapy. 90 (49%) patients received nitrates where there was no clinical indication. No patients in the analysis received NIV. Conclusion Some aspects of AHF assessment and management are not consistent with national guidelines. Our work has further demonstrated the diagnostic challenges facing pre-hospital clinicians and the potential overuse of nitrate therapy in this patient group. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/Suppl_1/A32.2 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.85
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Servicesen_US
dc.subjectHeart Failureen_US
dc.subjectClinical Auditen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic Techniques and Proceduresen_US
dc.subjectNoninvasive Ventilationen_US
dc.subjectPre-hospitalen_US
dc.titleThe pre-hospital management of acute heart failure: a clinical audit of current practiceen_US
dc.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract
dc.source.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-08-08
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-08-08
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2018-04
html.description.abstractAim There has been a drive towards an increase in community-based management of heart failure. When patients experience acute heart failure (AHF), the complex nature of this condition poses diagnostic uncertainty for first responders. It is widely accepted that all patients should be transferred promptly to hospital, however with the introduction of pre-hospital diuresis, nitrate therapy and more recently non-invasive ventilation (NIV), the debate into the appropriateness and limitations of so-called ‘stay-and-play’ management strategies for patients in AHF has been re-ignited. We examine the current clinical assessment and management of AHF within the London Ambulance Service. Method Ambulance Patient Report Forms (PRFs) from cases that were coded with heart failure, shortness of breath, cardiac problem and in cases of GTN administration. These cases were further analysed by a clinical review panel to identify patients with suspected AHF. Results 182 patients were included in the analysis between April and November 2016. There was a 68% compliance with national guidelines for clinical assessment (history, examination and ECG). 51 (28%) patients presenting with AHF were appropriately identified and given a primary diagnosis of AHF by the attending clinician. 136 (76%) patients in the analysis received sublingual nitrate therapy. 90 (49%) patients received nitrates where there was no clinical indication. No patients in the analysis received NIV. Conclusion Some aspects of AHF assessment and management are not consistent with national guidelines. Our work has further demonstrated the diagnostic challenges facing pre-hospital clinicians and the potential overuse of nitrate therapy in this patient group. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/Suppl_1/A32.2 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.85en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record