Objectives With a projected rise in care home residency and the disproportionate impact of epilepsy and seizures on older adults, understanding seizure-related needs in this population is crucial. Data silos and inconsistent recording of residence status make this challenging. We thus leveraged ambulance data to investigate seizure call-out incidence, characteristics, management and costs in care homes compared with the wider community. Design Retrospective analysis of dispatch data from a regional English ambulance service over four 9-month periods between 2014/2015 and 2021/2022. Suspected seizures in adults (≥16 years) were identified, with data on location, patient age, severity and management extracted. Incidence rates, trends over time and case characteristics were compared. Costs of ambulance response were estimated, and factors influencing emergency department (ED) conveyance were analysed using logistic regression. Setting North West Ambulance Service National Health Service Trust, serving an adult population of ~5.5 million. Participants Dispatch data for 98 752 suspected seizure cases. Results Care homes, accommodating ~0.8% of the regional population, accounted for 7.2% of seizure call-outs. Incidence was higher in care homes than the wider community (55.71 vs 5.97 per 1000 person/year in 2021/2022) and increased over time. Care home cases peaked around 8:00–9:00. Despite similar or lower severity, they had a higher ED conveyance rate (78.3% vs 70.6%). Conveyance likelihood was influenced by factors beyond severity: reduced in homes specialising in learning disabilities (adjusted OR=0.649) and increased in homes with nursing provision (adjusted OR=1.226). Care homes accounted for 7.26% of the £24 million cost. Conclusions This study highlights the growing seizure-related needs in care homes. Despite similar severity, most cases result in ED conveyance. Future research should examine the appropriateness and implications of these transfers, ensuring specialist services support the care home population effectively. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/11/e089126 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Background Paramedic engagement is crucial for the success of prehospital research studies. The Head injury evaluatiOn and aMbulancE Diagnosis (HOME) study aims to examine the feasibility of a diagnostic-test accuracy study to assess using the Canadian CT Head Rule in the prehospital setting to improve prehospital triage. However, significant recruitment challenges led to undertaking this qualitative study, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators to paramedic research engagement. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 13 paramedics with varying experience, both participants and non-participants in the HOME study, to understand their perspectives. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using an accepted thematic analysis approach, with data saturation guiding sample size. Results Four themes were identified. The first, Paramedic Perspectives on the HOME study, highlighted potential benefits for practice and patient care and identified recruitment challenges, including the unpredictable nature of paramedic work, geographical restrictions to recruitment, and poor awareness among hospital staff. The second, Personal and Professional Constraints Impacting Engagement, identified barriers such as time constraints due to demanding work schedules, burnout from high-intensity work, and mixed attitudes toward clinical studies, influenced by factors such as generational differences and past research experiences. The third, Considerations for Research Engagement Among Paramedics, explored factors influencing paramedics’ decisions to participate in research, including personal interest in the study topic, its relevance to their practice, flexibility in engagement, and ethical concerns about patient care. The fourth, Strategies for Enhancing Paramedic Research Engagement, suggested offering incentives for participation, enhancing interaction and recognition, and improving communication and organisational support. Conclusion With unpredictable workloads, a complex prehospital environment and multiple demands on their time, paramedics face substantial barriers to research engagement. This can be mitigated by remunerating and rewarding participation, adopting flexible approaches to training and research design and optimising communication and organisational support. https://emj.bmj.com/content/41/Suppl_3/A4.2 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Background: Apprenticeships are key to ensuring that private and public employers can recruit and develop workforces. The degree apprenticeship in paramedic practice allows learners to continue academic study while participating in on-the-job training. Objectives: The aim of this UK-based scoping review is to identify the barriers and challenges in practice-based education, and link the findings to paramedic degree apprenticeships. Methods: A scoping review was undertaken to examine the literature on degree apprenticeships and the barriers and challenges within practice-based education. Findings: Six studies were reviewed. None were specific to paramedicine, so analysis and evaluation were drawn from other professions. Three main themes were identified: role of the mentor/practice-based educator; stakeholder collaboration; and apprentice support. conclusion: Employers are key to the collaborative design of apprenticeship, yet multiple issues in terms of their working with higher education institutions exist. The interpretation of apprenticeship-specific terminology used to assess competence, and the subjective definition of expected standards were key concerns of practice educators. Employers need to provide education to practice educators to support the facilitation of learning and assessment. Responsibility for the success of apprentices lies with both employer and learner. More research is needed on barriers for each stakeholder. Employers require clearer guidance regarding funding and expectations. Abstract published with permission.

The use of prehospital early warning scores in ambulance services is widely endorsed to promptly identify patients at risk of clinical deterioration. Early warning scores enable clinicians to estimate risk based on clinical observations and vital signs, with higher scores indicating an elevated risk of adverse outcomes. Local healthcare systems establish threshold values for these scores to guide clinical decision-making, triage, and response, necessitating a careful balance between identifying critically unwell patients and managing the challenge of prioritisation. Given the limited evidence for optimal early warning scores in emergency department and prehospital care settings, a systematic review was carried out by Guan et al (2022) to assess the diagnostic accuracy of early warning scores for predicting in-hospital deterioration when applied in the emergency department or prehospital setting. This commentary aims to critically appraise the methods used within the review by Guan et al (2022) and expand upon the findings in the context of clinical practice. Abstract published with permission.

Background The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known. Methods We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)). Results Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)). Conclusion The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM. https://jech.bmj.com/content/77/9/565 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/