Mass casualty triage : using virtual reality in hazardous area response teams training
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Steven | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-29T16:22:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-02-29T16:22:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-12 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Thompson, S., 2023. Mass casualty triage : using virtual reality in hazardous area response teams training. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 15 (10), 418-427. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2041-9457 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-1376 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12968/jpar.2023.15.10.418 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/1693 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has become a pedagogic resource that complements the general training health professionals receive. VR could revolutionise hazardous area response team (HART) mass casualty incident (MCI) triage training. Aims: The study aimed to establish whether VR could improve the overall effectiveness of HART triage training and increase practitioner confidence and preparedness for an MCI. Methods: The author co-developed a VR marauding terrorist attack (MTA) triage scenario at a football stadium. The software was loaded onto Oculus Quest 2 VR headsets. HART paramedic participants completed an online survey before the exercise, which focused on demographics and experience. They were then familiarised with the VR equipment, which incorporated a tutorial on patient interaction. This was followed by a VR MTA exercise with 15 casualties, after which they completed an online survey to gauge their opinions. Results: All 36 HART paramedics recruited agreed VR would improve the effectiveness of HART paramedic training for mass casualty triage. Furthermore, 30 (83%) agreed that VR was more effective than the sand manikins currently used in training. Following the VR scenario, 31 (86%) of participants reported increased confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out mass casualty triage. Conclusion: VR can improve the effectiveness of the HART triage training and may increase HART paramedic confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out primary triage. Further studies with larger samples could determine if the results from this study can be generalisable across all frontline paramedic clinicians. Additionally, participant accuracy and time on task data should be evaluated.Background: In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has become a pedagogic resource that complements the general training health professionals receive. VR could revolutionise hazardous area response team (HART) mass casualty incident (MCI) triage training. Aims: The study aimed to establish whether VR could improve the overall effectiveness of HART triage training and increase practitioner confidence and preparedness for an MCI. Methods: The author co-developed a VR marauding terrorist attack (MTA) triage scenario at a football stadium. The software was loaded onto Oculus Quest 2 VR headsets. HART paramedic participants completed an online survey before the exercise, which focused on demographics and experience. They were then familiarised with the VR equipment, which incorporated a tutorial on patient interaction. This was followed by a VR MTA exercise with 15 casualties, after which they completed an online survey to gauge their opinions. Results: All 36 HART paramedics recruited agreed VR would improve the effectiveness of HART paramedic training for mass casualty triage. Furthermore, 30 (83%) agreed that VR was more effective than the sand manikins currently used in training. Following the VR scenario, 31 (86%) of participants reported increased confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out mass casualty triage. Conclusion: VR can improve the effectiveness of the HART triage training and may increase HART paramedic confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out primary triage. Further studies with larger samples could determine if the results from this study can be generalisable across all frontline paramedic clinicians. Additionally, participant accuracy and time on task data should be evaluated. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.subject | Emergency Medical Services | en_US |
dc.subject | Triage | en_US |
dc.subject | Mass Casualty Incidents | en_US |
dc.subject | Training and Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Virtual Reality | en_US |
dc.title | Mass casualty triage : using virtual reality in hazardous area response teams training | en_US |
dc.source.journaltitle | Journal of Paramedic Practice | en_US |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-02-28 | |
rioxxterms.version | NA | en_US |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-02-28 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_US |
refterms.panel | Unspecified | en_US |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2023-09-12 | |
html.description.abstract | Background: In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has become a pedagogic resource that complements the general training health professionals receive. VR could revolutionise hazardous area response team (HART) mass casualty incident (MCI) triage training. Aims: The study aimed to establish whether VR could improve the overall effectiveness of HART triage training and increase practitioner confidence and preparedness for an MCI. Methods: The author co-developed a VR marauding terrorist attack (MTA) triage scenario at a football stadium. The software was loaded onto Oculus Quest 2 VR headsets. HART paramedic participants completed an online survey before the exercise, which focused on demographics and experience. They were then familiarised with the VR equipment, which incorporated a tutorial on patient interaction. This was followed by a VR MTA exercise with 15 casualties, after which they completed an online survey to gauge their opinions. Results: All 36 HART paramedics recruited agreed VR would improve the effectiveness of HART paramedic training for mass casualty triage. Furthermore, 30 (83%) agreed that VR was more effective than the sand manikins currently used in training. Following the VR scenario, 31 (86%) of participants reported increased confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out mass casualty triage. Conclusion: VR can improve the effectiveness of the HART triage training and may increase HART paramedic confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out primary triage. Further studies with larger samples could determine if the results from this study can be generalisable across all frontline paramedic clinicians. Additionally, participant accuracy and time on task data should be evaluated.Background: In recent years, virtual reality (VR) has become a pedagogic resource that complements the general training health professionals receive. VR could revolutionise hazardous area response team (HART) mass casualty incident (MCI) triage training. Aims: The study aimed to establish whether VR could improve the overall effectiveness of HART triage training and increase practitioner confidence and preparedness for an MCI. Methods: The author co-developed a VR marauding terrorist attack (MTA) triage scenario at a football stadium. The software was loaded onto Oculus Quest 2 VR headsets. HART paramedic participants completed an online survey before the exercise, which focused on demographics and experience. They were then familiarised with the VR equipment, which incorporated a tutorial on patient interaction. This was followed by a VR MTA exercise with 15 casualties, after which they completed an online survey to gauge their opinions. Results: All 36 HART paramedics recruited agreed VR would improve the effectiveness of HART paramedic training for mass casualty triage. Furthermore, 30 (83%) agreed that VR was more effective than the sand manikins currently used in training. Following the VR scenario, 31 (86%) of participants reported increased confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out mass casualty triage. Conclusion: VR can improve the effectiveness of the HART triage training and may increase HART paramedic confidence in responding to an MCI and carrying out primary triage. Further studies with larger samples could determine if the results from this study can be generalisable across all frontline paramedic clinicians. Additionally, participant accuracy and time on task data should be evaluated. | en_US |