Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIngram, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorRees, Nigel
dc.contributor.authorSujan, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-17T15:02:46Z
dc.date.available2023-08-17T15:02:46Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.citationIngram, C., Rees, N., and Sujan, M., 2019. Decision making for patients categorised as 'amber' in a rural setting. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 11 (6) 239-245.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1759-1376
dc.identifier.issn2041-9457
dc.identifier.doi10.12968/jpar.2019.11.6.239
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/1537
dc.description.abstractBackground: Reducing unnecessary conveyances to hospital can help relieve pressure on emergency departments. Making decisions about conveyance in rural areas is particularly challenging because of the travel distances involved. Aims: To explore perceptions of paramedics in a rural setting about how they make decisions regarding conveyance and non-conveyance for patients categorised as ‘amber’ (serious but not life-threatening). Methods: Data were collected through interviews with 17 paramedics working in rural areas, which were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings: Paramedics perceive hospitals as places of safety for themselves (psychological safety) and for patients (patient safety). Lower levels of psychological safety (e.g. because of an organisational blame culture) and perceived increased risks to patient safety (e.g. because of a lack of health resources in the community) influence paramedic decision making on conveying patients to hospital. Conclusion: Current practice contributes to increasing pressures on emergency departments. Ambulance services should work towards a non-punitive culture of safety where paramedics feel they can make decisions based on their experience and expertise rather than to protect themselves. Abstract published with permission.
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Servicesen_US
dc.subjectDecision Makingen_US
dc.subjectPatient Safetyen_US
dc.subjectRural Populationen_US
dc.subjectGeographic Mappingen_US
dc.titleDecision making for patients categorised as 'amber' in a rural settingen_US
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Paramedic Practiceen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-05-24
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-05-24
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2019-06-02
html.description.abstractBackground: Reducing unnecessary conveyances to hospital can help relieve pressure on emergency departments. Making decisions about conveyance in rural areas is particularly challenging because of the travel distances involved. Aims: To explore perceptions of paramedics in a rural setting about how they make decisions regarding conveyance and non-conveyance for patients categorised as ‘amber’ (serious but not life-threatening). Methods: Data were collected through interviews with 17 paramedics working in rural areas, which were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings: Paramedics perceive hospitals as places of safety for themselves (psychological safety) and for patients (patient safety). Lower levels of psychological safety (e.g. because of an organisational blame culture) and perceived increased risks to patient safety (e.g. because of a lack of health resources in the community) influence paramedic decision making on conveying patients to hospital. Conclusion: Current practice contributes to increasing pressures on emergency departments. Ambulance services should work towards a non-punitive culture of safety where paramedics feel they can make decisions based on their experience and expertise rather than to protect themselves. Abstract published with permission.en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record