To collar or not to collar. Views of pre-hospital emergency care providers on immobilisation without cervical collars: a focus group study
Average rating
Cast your vote
You can rate an item by clicking the amount of stars they wish to award to this item.
When enough users have cast their vote on this item, the average rating will also be shown.
Star rating
Your vote was cast
Thank you for your feedback
Thank you for your feedback
Author
Thompson, LeeShaw, Gary
Bates, Charlotte
Hawkins, Christopher
McClelland, Graham
McMeekin, Peter
Journal title
British Paramedic Journal
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a rare event, with high numbers of patients unnecessarily immobilised with no potential benefit based on limited evidence from the 1950s and 1960s. Contemporary opinion now challenges the notion that traditional immobilisation prevents movement and protects the spine. Current literature suggests that these methods which include semi-rigid collars can potentially cause more movement of the spine and harm the patient. The purpose of this study was to explore the views and perspectives of pre-hospital care providers on immobilising patients without the use of a semi-rigid collar. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tcop/bpj/2021/00000006/00000001/art00006 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38 Abstract published with permission.ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.29045/14784726.2021.6.6.1.38
Scopus Count
Collections