Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Alison
dc.contributor.authorRobson, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-22T12:49:43Z
dc.date.available2021-05-22T12:49:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.citationWalker, A. and Robson, B., 2010. Medical and prehospital care training in UK fire and rescue services. Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ, 27 (12), 960-961.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-0205
dc.identifier.issn1472-0213
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emj.2009.081828
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12417/1099
dc.description.abstractWe were interested to see the paper by Quinn et al1 in this month's EMJ. We undertook a similar survey published in the EMJ in 2005 on the Fire Service management of burns,2 which concentrated on burns but also reviewed general levels of clinical training and skills within the Fire and Rescue Services (FRS), also with a response rate of over 70%. At the time 44/62 services had trained all their firefighters in the delivery of supplementary oxygen (71%), and it seems in some areas there is little change in skills, as in this paper 72% of responding services trained firefighters to provide supplementary oxygen. We also found similar levels of involvement in clinical training from both local hospitals and other prehospital organisations including NHS Ambulance Trusts. Since the publication of both our paper and that of Lee and Porter3 in 2007, the UK FRS through the Chief Fire Officers Association (CFOA) have been working to standardise prehospital immediate care provided by UK firefighters. This work has been looking at ways to develop a minimum standard of knowledge and application that satisfies the demanding requirements of both the FRS and the Health and Safety Executive. A further area for development has been in considering effective Clinical Governance systems; an area which the FRS has had little previous involvement. The work has recently been given project status by the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG), the government department responsible for the FRS. In London, excellent results have been seen in a pilot project (Immediate Emergency Care), in which the London Fire Brigade (LFB) have worked closely with London Ambulance Service (LAS) in all aspects of the delivery of training, operational and clinical governance policies and procedures, and shared equipment protocols. The pilot is now being rolled out to all operational staff across LFB and has been made available to other regions as a working model. It is widely accepted that the natural partners for the FRS are NHS Ambulance Trusts. The main objective of the CLG project is to consider whether the progress made in London can be duplicated across the UK, reducing the requirement for FRS to rely on commercially driven or locally produced training. Initial indications suggest that this can be delivered. The Faculty of Prehospital Care has also supported developments in FRS Immediate Care. In summary, a great deal of work has already been completed, with more in development, around immediate emergency care by the UK Fire and Rescue Services. https://emj.bmj.com/content/27/12/960.2. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.081828
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectEmergency Medical Servicesen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectFiresen_US
dc.subjectRescue Worken_US
dc.subjectPre-hospital Careen_US
dc.titleMedical and prehospital care training in UK fire and rescue servicesen_US
dc.source.journaltitleEmergency Medicine Journal : EMJen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-02-13
rioxxterms.versionNAen_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_US
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_US
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_US
refterms.dateFirstOnline2010-12
html.description.abstractWe were interested to see the paper by Quinn et al1 in this month's EMJ. We undertook a similar survey published in the EMJ in 2005 on the Fire Service management of burns,2 which concentrated on burns but also reviewed general levels of clinical training and skills within the Fire and Rescue Services (FRS), also with a response rate of over 70%. At the time 44/62 services had trained all their firefighters in the delivery of supplementary oxygen (71%), and it seems in some areas there is little change in skills, as in this paper 72% of responding services trained firefighters to provide supplementary oxygen. We also found similar levels of involvement in clinical training from both local hospitals and other prehospital organisations including NHS Ambulance Trusts. Since the publication of both our paper and that of Lee and Porter3 in 2007, the UK FRS through the Chief Fire Officers Association (CFOA) have been working to standardise prehospital immediate care provided by UK firefighters. This work has been looking at ways to develop a minimum standard of knowledge and application that satisfies the demanding requirements of both the FRS and the Health and Safety Executive. A further area for development has been in considering effective Clinical Governance systems; an area which the FRS has had little previous involvement. The work has recently been given project status by the Department for Communities and Local Government (CLG), the government department responsible for the FRS. In London, excellent results have been seen in a pilot project (Immediate Emergency Care), in which the London Fire Brigade (LFB) have worked closely with London Ambulance Service (LAS) in all aspects of the delivery of training, operational and clinical governance policies and procedures, and shared equipment protocols. The pilot is now being rolled out to all operational staff across LFB and has been made available to other regions as a working model. It is widely accepted that the natural partners for the FRS are NHS Ambulance Trusts. The main objective of the CLG project is to consider whether the progress made in London can be duplicated across the UK, reducing the requirement for FRS to rely on commercially driven or locally produced training. Initial indications suggest that this can be delivered. The Faculty of Prehospital Care has also supported developments in FRS Immediate Care. In summary, a great deal of work has already been completed, with more in development, around immediate emergency care by the UK Fire and Rescue Services. https://emj.bmj.com/content/27/12/960.2. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.081828en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record