Development and validation of a pragmatic prehospital tool to identify stroke mimic patients
McClelland, Graham
Rodgers, Helen Flynn, Darren Price, Christopher
Rodgers, Helen
Flynn, Darren
Price, Christopher
Citations
Altmetric:
Journal Title
Book Title
Publication Volume
Publication Issue
Publication Begin Page
Publication End Page
Publication Number of Pages
Collections
Abstract
Aim Stroke mimics (SM) are non-stroke conditions producing
stroke-like symptoms. Prehospital stroke identification tools
prioritise sensitivity over specificity.1 It is estimated
that >25% of prehospital suspected stroke patients are SM.2
Failure to identify SM creates inefficient use of ambulances
and specialist stroke services. We developed a pragmatic tool
to identify SM amongst suspected prehospital stroke patients.
Method The tool was developed using regression analysis of
clinical variables documented in ambulance records of suspected stroke patients linked to primary hospital diagnoses
(derivation dataset, n=1,650, 40% SM).3 It was refined using
feedback from paramedics (n=3) and hospital clinicians (n=9),
and analysis of an expanded prehospital derivation dataset
(n=3,797, 41% SM (original 1650 patients included)).
Results The STEAM tool combines six variables: 1 point for Systolic
blood pressure <90 mmHg; 1 point for Temperature >38.5°C with
Abstracts
A2 BMJ Open 2018;8(Suppl 1):A1–A34
(NHS). Protected by copyright.
on 14 August 2019 at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ BMJ Open: first published as 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.6 on 16 April 2018. Downloaded from
heart rate >90 bpm; 1 point for seizures or 2 points for seizures
with known diagnosis of Epilepsy; 1 point for Age <40 years or 2
points for age <30 years; 1 point for headache with known diagnosis of Migraine; 1 point for FAST-ve. A score of 2 on STEAM predicted SM diagnosis in the derivation dataset with 5.5% sensitivity,
99.6% specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of 91.4%.
External validation (n=1,848, 33% SM) showed 5.5% sensitivity,
99.4% specificity and a PPV of 82.5%.
Conclusion STEAM uses common clinical characteristics to
identify SM patients with high certainty. The benefits of using
STEAM to reduce SM admissions to stroke services need to
be weighed up against delayed admissions for stroke patients
wrongly identified as SM.
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/8/Suppl_1/A2.3
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-EMS.6